TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: NRC Report
From: "W. Wesley Groleau (Wes)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 1996 10:41:45 EST
Reply-To: "W. Wesley Groleau (Wes)" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (17 lines)
There has been some criticism of the NRC report.  Much of this criticism
is based on a posted summary of the report.  I wonder about a couple of

How accurately does the summary reflect the full report?
Did the summary come from the study group or from a reader of the report?

Finally, since the summary ends with "This report will be..."
some people might have thought it WAS the full report.  Perhaps
"The full report will be..." would be safer.

W. Wesley Groleau (Wes)                                Office: 219-429-4923
Hughes Defense Communications (MS 10-40)                 Home: 219-471-7206
Fort Wayne,  IN   46808                  (Unix): [log in to unmask]