CHI-WEB Archives

ACM SIGCHI WWW Human Factors (Open Discussion)

CHI-WEB@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Francois Jordaan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Francois Jordaan <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 15:03:59 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (77 lines)
I agree the image should be a link. The ideal is that only a single <a>
element is used, containing both the image and heading. Just because they're
in separate columns doesn't rule this out, you may be able to get the effect
you want using CSS. (I may be able to help if you can show me the layout you
want to achieve.) This approach solves both the whitespace and alt text
dilemmas, elaborated below.

Often, I know, it's impossible to do use a single <a>, and you have to use
two separate <a> elements. This raises two questions: whitespace and alt
text.

1) As for separating links by more than whitespace, as far as I know this
rule was created to compensate for some older text and speech browsers that
are unable to differentiate between a series of consecutive links if they
are not separated by one or more unlinked characters. I don't know how
widespread these browsers are nowadays, but it's obviously their fault if
they're misrepresenting valid markup. The usual answer was kludges like
inserting punctuation, audible as "vertical bar" or "square bracket", which
IMO is not very helpful either. So at the moment I'd recommend you ignore
this rule.

2) As for alt text, this is a difficult one indeed. Last year I asked the
WAI list whether alt text is necessary on an image next to an identical text
caption:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2004JulSep/thread.html
"Is ALT text necessary if there's an identical caption adjacent?"

The consensus was that alt="" is appropriate in such cases. But the thread
did not answer the question what to do if the image is also a link. 

We had a similar problem on one of our websites recently. You have 3
options:

a) Correctly used alt text (a text alternative for the picture)
   PROBLEM: This link may not make sense out of context

b) alt=""
   PROBLEM: Mysterious "empty" links

c) alt="Heading text" (Repeat the heading text in the alt)

This was the compromise we reluctantly decided on. This way the links make
sense out of context. The purpose of the images were mainly decorative, so
we didn't feel as if the blind user was missing out on any important
information. Unfortunately, you end up with annoying repetition when the
page is read out linearly, and also an unrealistic representation of the
number of links on the page.

If you feel in your case that the images convey important information, then
I guess the following option would be appropriate:

d) alt="Heading text (Image: Hand holding a flower)"

I hope that helps!

francois

Wheel Group, Beaumont House, Kensington Village, Avonmore Road, London W14
8TS
 
T +44 (0)20 7348 1000    F +44 (0)20 7348 1111
D +44 (0)20 7348 1049
[log in to unmask]
www.wheel.co.uk
 

_____________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by MessageLabs.

    --------------------------------------------------------------
    Tip of the Day: Suspend your subscription if using auto replies
     CHI-WEB: www.sigchi.org/web POSTINGS: mailto:[log in to unmask]
              MODERATORS: mailto:[log in to unmask]
       SUBSCRIPTION CHANGES & FAQ:  www.sigchi.org/web/faq.html
    --------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2