TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
X-To:
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Hal Hart <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 12 Mar 1997 09:59:07 -0800
In-Reply-To:
Your message of Wed, 12 Mar 97 11:01:45 CST. <[log in to unmask]>
Comments:
RFC822 error: <W> CC field duplicated. Last occurrence was retained.
Reply-To:
Hal Hart <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
>...
>> Having just come back from SIGCSE, by the way, I can say that lots
>> of educational institutions are finding C++ to be --errr-- less than
>> ideal for their intro courses. They are, of course, taking a hard look
>> at Java, but they are _also_ taking a hard look at Ada. Whereas 5 years ago,
>> the very idea of Ada would be laughed out of many faculties, Ada is
>> winning some faculty votes now, and even if Ada loses, it is now
>> a serious candidate. They're not laughing so hard now. This is good.:-)
>
>I suddenly have a picture in my mind of 10 years from now (perhaps even
>sooner):  Having to switch to Ada for new projects because there just
>aren't enough C++ programmers available.

I don't know if that will be the reason or because the blush will be
off C++ (& Java?) by then big time, but we dreamed a lot about this
scenario at SIGCSE'97, hence several button slogan proposals for next
year that Mike didn't list:  (actually, all of these are good for our
industry & Gov't audiences too, not just educators)

"Ada - You'll [still] love us tomorrow"
"You'll come back to Ada"
"Ada has always been here for you, Always will be"
"Ada - Worked for you yesterday, Will work for you tomorrow"
"Ada's always here for you"
 etc.

        -- hh

ATOM RSS1 RSS2