TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
"R. Ebert" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 12 Feb 1997 20:38:01 -0800
Reply-To:
Edward Colbert <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: C++-to-Ada95 Translators?
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From:
Edward Colbert <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines) 
>    This is exactly what Rational uses as one of their selling points for
>    Rose.  I heard a presentation last week at OOP'97.  Of course their
>    target language in the presentation was not Ada95 but Java... At least
>    they pretend that Ada95 would work equally well.
>
>    (BTW, they had lots of posters about Ada95 in their booth, but nobody
>    could answer my questions about the availablity of their compilers. UML
>    is the hot topic now)

According to the Rational Rep for the project I'm consulting on, its going to be a while.

Take Care,
Ed

ATOM RSS1 RSS2