TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Jeff Carter <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 Jun 2000 18:24:11 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Jeff Carter <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
"W. Wesley Groleau x4923" wrote:
> This is the primary reason for NOT going to C++.  Ada is the
> best choice for avoiding such errors, with Eiffel a close second.
> A distant third is Java.  C and C++ are close to the bottom of the
> for defect-prevention.

Certainly modern dialects of Pascal are at least as good as Java in
error-prevention.

--
Jeff Carter
"Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries."
Monty Python & the Holy Grail

ATOM RSS1 RSS2