TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Run-time checking
From:
Colin Paul Gloster <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 7 Nov 2001 05:21:45 -0500
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
[log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (8 lines) 
On Tue, 6 Nov 2001, Corey Minyard wrote:
"[..]

GNAT is not fully conformant to all the semantics required for validation
in it's default mode, and rightly so, I believe. [..]"

Err, why does this seem to be a plus point to you?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2