TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Samuel Mize <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 5 Nov 1997 09:50:34 -0600
Reply-To:
Samuel Mize <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Samuel Mize <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]> from "Samuel Mize" at Nov 5, 97 09:38:03 am
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Samuel Mize wrote:

> In Ada 95, IF your implementation is compliant with the real-time
> Annex (D), a "delay 0.0" or even "delay -t" would provide one, and in
> the default task dispatching policy will cede the processor to another
> ready task of the same priority (D.2.2(11)).

MY MISTAKE!  The default policy is undefined.  an Annex-D-compliant
implementation LETS YOU SPECIFY this policy.

Best,
Sam Mize

--
Samuel Mize -- [log in to unmask] -- Team Ada
(personal net account)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2