TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Mike Brenner <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 7 Nov 1997 15:12:54 -0800
Reply-To:
AdaWorks <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
AdaWorks <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (22 lines)
On Wed, 5 Nov 1997, Mike Brenner wrote:

> DOS is needed
> for the future of Ada because we need to give Ada to people who are
> stuck on DOS machines today.

  And there are far more of these, still using 80286/36/46 machines than
  seems to be acknowledged by those who are able to afford the latest
  whiz-bang processors and operating systems.  There are still lots of
  XT class machines opeating MS-DOS 3.1 on 8088 machines.  And these are
  are used as single-function workstations in environments where windoz
  would impede rather than enhance productivity.

  Richard Riehle
  AdaWorks Software Engineering
  Suite 30
  2555 Park Boulevard
  Palo Alto, CA  94306
  (650) 328-1815
   FAX  328-1112
  [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2