TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To: Jacob Sparre Andersen <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 06:22:53 -0700
Reply-To: "Joyce L. Tokar" <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: "Joyce L. Tokar" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (28 lines)
On Fri, 5 May 2000 15:18:54 +0200, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:

>John McCabe wrote:
>> So to me it sounds like a possible problem, but only in
>> certain circumstances.  Besides - this will probably be
>> updated in Ada 0x!
>Which reminds me: Shouldn't ISO standards be reviewed every
>five years?

Currently, the Ada 95 ISO standard is under review and a Technical Corrigendum is to be issued later this year which addresses a
number of technical issues that have been seen in the Ada 95 standard.  This Corrigendum represents the five year update to the

Joyce Tokar
Head of Delegation
US TAG to SC 22/WG 9

>I presume that the conclusion will be "wait another five
>years", but I would like to know it.
>"Sleep is just a cheap substitute for coffee"