TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Hamilton, J. LTC EECS" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Hamilton, J. LTC EECS
Date:
Wed, 21 May 1997 14:20:45 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
Hal and others, I would invite all interested parties to read the policy
memorandum on the Ada IC web site.

http://www.sw-eng.falls-church.va.us/AdaIC/pol-hist

As for the impact of the memo relative to DoDD 3405.1&2 I really would
rather have that answered by a policy expert from OSD.   Since you asked
me for an official interpretation of policy I am referring it to Ms.
Linda Brown, who is Mr. Paige's designated expert in this area.

Regards

Drew

**********************************
John  A. Hamilton, Jr., Ph.D.
Lieutenant Colonel, US Army
Chief, AJPO
**********************************
>----------
>From:  Hal Hart[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
>Sent:  Wednesday, May 21, 1997 4:43 AM
>To:    Drew Hamilton
>Cc:    [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask];
>[log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]
>Subject:       Weight of April-29 Paige Memo?
>
> DREW:  What is the impact or authority of Mr. Paige's April 29
>memorandum (announcing Software Engineering Reviews, dropping of
>the language requirement, etc.) relative to DoDD's 3405.1 & -.2
>(which I assume will still take many months to revise, coordinate,
>& sign out)?
>
>Does the memorandum actually have the immediate official policy effect
>the same as revising the Directive(s)?  Or what?
>
>Thanks for giving us an official interpretation,               -- Hal
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2