TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Tucker Taft <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 8 Feb 1999 01:47:00 +0100
Reply-To:
Jerry van Dijk <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Jerry van Dijk <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]> from "Tucker Taft" at Feb 7, 99 12:54:17 pm
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Tucker Taft wrote:

> Because I believe Ada is particularly good for realtime and embedded
> systems should not be construed as meaning it is bad for other
> domains.  However, one must generally pick one battle to fight at a time.

Yep, we all know Ada's strenght in this area. What is worrysome, is that
it seems Ada is now also on the defensive here.

> Presuming you believe Ada is a great fit for your domain of interest,
> feel free to create a new FAQ targeted to that domain.  I am probably
> not much of an expert in your domain, and hence would not be a great
> spokesperson for it.

Well, currently I have hardly time to eat (really!) but I will make
such an attempt.

--
-- Jerry van Dijk | Leiden, Holland
-- Team Ada       | [log in to unmask]
-- see http://stad.dsl.nl/~jvandyk

ATOM RSS1 RSS2