Tue, 22 Jun 1999 09:36:00 -0400
On 6/21/99 11:46 AM, W. Wesley Groleau x4923 wrote:
>Nor is it true (as they try to mislead us to think) that the Java
>_language_ is somehow needed to get the benefits of J-Code. Not only are
>there at least two Ada to J-Code compilers, but there are ways to generate
>J-Code from Cobol, C++, Eiffel, Smalltalk, BASIC, and a host of others. I
>forget the URL and NT problems prevent me calling up Netscape right now,
>but do a Web search for the page titles "Languages for the Java Virtual
"Languages for the Java VM"
"The following is a list of programming languages for the Java
virtual machine aside of Java itself. Currently (Dec 1997),
it comprises about 60 different systems."