TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Sundar_K <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 30 Mar 2001 08:44:23 -0500
Reply-To:
Terry Westley <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Terry Westley <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<3F0EF0E6F3ACD41186CD0008C7B9B03701963BDC@BETCLT03>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
>         I am looking for a tool which can parse through an existing Ada 83
> code and bring out the incompatibilities in it with respect to Ada 95
> standard. Can any one give me suggestions or leads in this? As I do not
> subscribe to this mailing list, kindly cc. the replies to me.

We just completed converting 500 KSLOC from Ada 83 (VADS) to
work with an Ada 95 compiler (GNAT).  My suggestion is...

Use an Ada 95 compiler.

--
Terry Westley
Veridian Engineering
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2