TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Stephen D. B. Wolthusen" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 17:38:50 +0100
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"Stephen D. B. Wolthusen" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
All,

on a only somewhat related note... is anyone aware of a restricted runtime
environment (for Windows NT) that doesn't have dependencies on userland
libraries (msvcrt, threading)?

Background is that we have code that needs to run as kernel modules/kernel
dlls/device drivers under Windows NT/2000/XP. Using pragma no_run_time is a
bit harsh in its restrictions and leads to code that is less than perfectly
readable (e.g. with regard to technically unconstrained arays).

So -- is anyone present or aware of folks that have developed device
drivers in Ada under Windows and maybe have a neutered GNULL
implementation? Long shot, I know.

--
        later,
        Stephen

Fraunhofer-IGD                 | mailto:
Stephen Wolthusen              | [log in to unmask]
Fraunhoferstr. 5               | [log in to unmask]
64283 Darmstadt                | [log in to unmask]
GERMANY                        |
                               |
Tel +49 (0) 6151 155 539       | Fax: +49 (0) 6151 155 499

ATOM RSS1 RSS2