LISTSERV - TEAM-ADA Archives - LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

	LISTSERV Archives
	TEAM-ADA Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Condense Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Sender:	"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:	Weight of April-29 Paige Memo?
From:	"Hal Hart (Hal Hart)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Wed, 21 May 1997 01:43:51 -0700
X-cc:	[log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]
X-To:	Drew Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:	Hal Hart <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (11 lines)

 DREW:  What is the impact or authority of Mr. Paige's April 29
memorandum (announcing Software Engineering Reviews, dropping of
the language requirement, etc.) relative to DoDD's 3405.1 & -.2
(which I assume will still take many months to revise, coordinate,
& sign out)?

Does the memorandum actually have the immediate official policy effect
the same as revising the Directive(s)?  Or what?

Thanks for giving us an official interpretation,                -- Hal

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ACM.ORG