TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-type:
TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: ESA now also "prefer" C++ instead of Ada on some projects
From:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Mon, 4 Dec 2000 14:39:09 +0000
In-Reply-To:
<1783411C46BCD21182E20008C7EAA092039D7B94@coeis01nok>
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
[log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (10 lines) 
>The main reason is lack of multiple inheritance in Ada 95.

Interesting, especially as section 4.6 of the Ada 95 Rationale goes into some
detail on how to implement Multiple Inheritance in Ada.

Perhaps the 'reason' should be changed to 'developers can't be bothered to try
to understand how to use Multiple Inheritance in Ada 95'.

John

ATOM RSS1 RSS2