> Which doesn't mean that you shouldn't send him an e-mail pointing out
> how the designers who:
> >"... are fatalistic about the possibility of eliminating bugs."
> are simply ignorant of Ada.
Even though the article's nearly two years old, I will. And I'll ask why
he failed to mention Ada (or even some other language that's less of a
pariah than Ada), since it has all Java's "safety features" and more,
without the speed problem he made so much of.
If I can find a good e-mail address.