TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Robert I. Eachus" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Robert I. Eachus
Date:
Tue, 21 Jul 1998 12:02:17 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
At 09:32 AM 7/21/98 -0500, W. Wesley Groleau x4923 wrote:
>When I used "1" for C and "10" for Ada, they were just markers to put Java
>in perspective.  I didn't mean C is the worst possible language, nor Ada
>the best.  But change "possible" to "available" and they're pretty close.
>(Flame-bait)

    How can I resist?  Using your scale I would put C++ at -20.  This is
not saying that it is so horrible, but that in my applications C and Ada
are pretty close, but C++ is much worse than either.  Java is currently
still a non-starter, but it may show up any day now.

                                        Robert I. Eachus

with Standard_Disclaimer;
use  Standard_Disclaimer;
function Message (Text: in Clever_Ideas) return Better_Ideas is...

ATOM RSS1 RSS2