TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Tom Timberlake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 17 Nov 1999 13:31:17 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
Tom Timberlake <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Ada gets a bit of good press in the 11/8/99 issue of Gov't Computer News,
in an article on Software Development Tools pg 45.

"Ada, the required language for most DOD projects from 1991 through 1993,
is still strongly recommended for embedded systems and other defense work.
The Information Technology Standards Guidance V3.1, which is still in
effect, deprecates the use of C."
...
"The same document recommends against C++, stating: 'because the mechanics
of the C language are embedded in C++, it is susceptible to many of the
above noted difficultiew with C ...  Use of C++ for the development of
critical systems applications is not recommended.' "

The article also lists 9 Ada compiler vendors.

===============
Tom Timberlake
The Boeing Company
Phantom Works Software
mailto:[log in to unmask]

P.O. Box 3707
Mail Stop 4A-25
Seattle, WA.  98124-2207
USA

ATOM RSS1 RSS2