TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stanley Allen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stanley Allen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 26 Jul 1998 15:02:38 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Matthew S. Whiting wrote:
>
> It seems a little melodramatic to me to consider a flight SIMULATOR to
> be a safety critical application. Now a flight CONTROL system in a real
> airplane is another matter...
>

If you are thinking along the lines of "Microsoft Flight Simulator",
you are correct. However, many simulation facilities for pilot
*certification* training involve a lot of large moving parts. These
are the "motion-based" training simulators which often have a cockpit
elevated using hydraulic stilts and which allow multiple degrees of
motion. In addition to simple take-off and landing motions (BTW,
I say "simple" knowing that the safety aspects of these activities
are not trivial), such a training device may often be programmable
via instructor inputs to simulate motion resulting from strong winds,
ascents and descents, and "battle" action. For these kinds of
simulators, life- or limb-threatening hazards are not unknown.

--
Stanley Allen
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2