TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 9 Oct 1998 09:20:21 -0500
Reply-To:
"W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
> .... spent several years working with the R1000, where the OS was Ada, and
> there was no command-line, rather, there was a "command window" which was an
> Ada declare block--no JCL, no shell scripts, no .BAT files, just 100% Ada!
> Boy was I disappointed...

Rhetorical question (but go ahead and answer if you wish): Why did the
R1000 & Delta die when it was so obviously "superior" ?  Does that sound
like another common lament from our group?

(I also once used a Unix shell which was designed so that a screen capture
would look like an Ada program.  It also never caught on....)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2