TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Harbaugh, John S" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 11 Oct 1999 13:02:06 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"Harbaugh, John S" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Hi All,

Excuse me, but where's the beef?  If I pick up a copy of "Visual Modeling with Rational Rose and UML", or "Instant UML", or other popular text, I find many examples of UML -> C++ or UML -> Java, but no Ada.  Can anyone recommend a good, published mapping?

Cheers,

        - John

> ----------
> From:         Tom Moran[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Reply To:     Tom Moran
> Sent:         Monday, October 11, 1999 12:29 PM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      Re: CACM Ada comment
>
> [log in to unmask] says:
> >Rational Rose has an Ada add-in that successfully generates Ada 95 from
> >UML.
>   Perhaps a Rational employee, say the guest editor of the issue,
> would like to send a letter to the editor correcting the article's
> ignorance of the situation.
>   Ditto for other folks' illumination on the subject, especially as
> they go cover other areas than the Rational Rose product.
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2