Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 9 Jun 2000 15:05:47 -0400 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I thought RTLinux's approach fixed the standard Linux
kernel weaknesses by treating it as a low priority task
running ontop of a hard real-time kernel. Or is there
something else going on?
--
Tony Bartolini
ARINC Incorporated
-----Original Message-----
From: W. Wesley Groleau x4923 [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2000 2:36 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Ada RTOS.
> Linux is not a real-time OS and ....
>
> Another problem area ... tasking implementation. ....
>
> The other drawback ...time to evaluate the scheduling database ....
OK, so Linux has problems, that's no surprise. But it's overall a good
system, and competing with it would be a huge challenge.
What if someone (yeah, I know, I should do it myself) were to fix a
problem by replacing a _piece_ of Linux with a much superior equivalent
written in Ada?
--
Wes Groleau
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~wgroleau
|
|
|