TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Karl A. Nyberg" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 13 Mar 1997 15:37:31 EST
In-Reply-To:
<9703132022.AA19040@most> ([log in to unmask])
X-To:
Reply-To:
"Karl A. Nyberg" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
   Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]
   Date:         Thu, 13 Mar 1997 15:21:57 EST
   From: "W. Wesley Groleau (Wes)" <[log in to unmask]>

   :> You know, the dropped mandate may be beneficial to the Ada community
   :> because Ada will now have to survive on actual merits, instead of
   :> theoretical ones.  A lot of vendors are going to have to get their acts
   :> together in a big way if they're going to make it in an open,
   :> competitive arena.

Why should Ada compilers (or vendors) be any different than other languages,
or common desktop operating systems or Web browsers or Internet providers?

All that's necessary is convince the buying public that quarter-to-quarter
revenue / profit mentality and / or stock price is more important than
quality...

-- Karl --

ATOM RSS1 RSS2