TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
From: "Davenport, Darren" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 12:37:42 -0600
Reply-To: "Davenport, Darren" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (24 lines)
Why don't you ask ACT for some info about some projects?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Sparks [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 1998 12:04 PM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      Information request
> Hi Team-Adaphiles,
> I need some help in getting some information on the projects that have
> used GNAT for real-time embedded applications.  My lead is concerned
> that GNAT will not be suitable, however, I need proof to dispel his
> concerns.  The situation we are coming across here at work is that we
> are going to use another compiler vendor.  We currently have a
> dependence on VADS.  My lead wants as minimal an impact, however, I
> don't see this happening.  I suggested using some of Ada 95's new
> library support for tasking and he felt that it was not stable enough
> to use.  Any help is always appreciated.
> --
> Chris Sparks