TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
From: Geoff Bull <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 22:12:39 +1100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: Geoff Bull <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (15 lines)
Samuel Mize <[log in to unmask]> writes:

> Ada's tagged types provide (in my opinion) excellent facilities for
> object-oriented programming.  However, some people find it disturbing
> that Ada doesn't provide a "class" wrapper to encapsulate an object's
> data type and operations.

That is why we have Java, Smalltalk, C++, ...
For all those disturbed people who never bothered to take  the time
to look at the advantages of Ada.


Cheers
Geoff

ATOM RSS1 RSS2