Date:
Tue, 13 Oct 1998 09:59:43 -0400
MIME-version:
1.0
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization:
Lockheed Martin M&DS
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
|
I've had that letter to the editor posted outside my office for several
days now, should've mentioned it here. Thanks Karl! BTW, the URL for
CrossTalk is:
http://www.stsc.hill.af.mil/CrossTalk/crostalk.html
The letter itself is at
http://www.stsc.hill.af.mil/CrossTalk/1998/oct/letters.html
Marc A. Criley
Chief Software Architect
Lockheed Martin ATWCS
[log in to unmask]
Phone: (610) 354-7861
Fax : (610) 354-7308
--
Karl A. Nyberg wrote:
>
> >From the Letter to the Editor, Crosstalk: The Journal of Defense Software
> Engineering, October 1998:
>
> ...
>
> In an article aimed at metrics novices, it is very important to
> point out some of th eknown hazards of software metrics. The fact
> that lines of code can't be used to measure economic p roductivity
> is definitely a known hazard that should be stressed.
>
> In a comparative study of 10 version of the same period using 10
> different programming languages (Ada 83, Ada95, C, C++, Objective C,
> PL/I, Assembler, CHILL, Pascal and Smalltalk), the lines of code
> metric failed to show either the highest productivity or best
> quality. Overall the lowest cost and fewest defects were found in
> Smalltalk and Ada95, but the lines of code metric favored
> assembler. Function points correctly identified Smalltalk and Ada95
> as being superior, but lines of code failed to do this.
>
> Capers Jones
> Software Productivity Reserach
>
> OK, guys - spin it!
>
> -- Karl --
|
|
|