TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy


Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
"Rush Kester; Senior Software Engineer" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Rush Kester; Senior Software Engineer
Tue, 26 Nov 1996 13:34:47 -0500
text/plain (42 lines)
Thought you folks would appreciate the response I got to my suggestions to
enhance their definition of Ada.

Rush Kester
W (301) 640-3632 (in person M-F: 9am-5pm EST, voicemail any time)
Fax        -4750 or -4940

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 13:21:38 -0500
From: Phil Margolis <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: User Definition Correction

Hello Rush -

You Ada folks sure do make a potent lobbying force. We have added Ada to
our programming languages page. We'll conisder your other recommendation to
mention Ada's unique ANSI and ISO status.

- Philip Margolis
Sandy Bay Software

At 07:42 AM 11/26/96 -0700, you wrote:
>submitted on November 26, 1996
>EMAIL: [log in to unmask]
>Comments: I checked out your Webopedia after a friend, Dr. Michael Feldman
>of GWU recommended it to me.  It's a great idea and I look forward to
>exploring it further in the near future.
>In reading your description of the Ada programming language you neglect to
>mention that it is the first (and perhaps only) ANSI & ISO standardized
>object-oriented programming language.
>In addition in the listing for standardized programming language, you fail
>to include Ada at all.