On Fri, 5 May 2000 15:18:54 +0200, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
>John McCabe wrote:
>> So to me it sounds like a possible problem, but only in
>> certain circumstances. Besides - this will probably be
>> updated in Ada 0x!
>Which reminds me: Shouldn't ISO standards be reviewed every
Currently, the Ada 95 ISO standard is under review and a Technical Corrigendum is to be issued later this year which addresses a
number of technical issues that have been seen in the Ada 95 standard. This Corrigendum represents the five year update to the
Head of Delegation
US TAG to SC 22/WG 9
>I presume that the conclusion will be "wait another five
>years", but I would like to know it.
>"Sleep is just a cheap substitute for coffee"