TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Conn <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Richard Conn <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 18 Jul 2000 22:49:32 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
It's funny that this discussion has calmed down at least once, almost
to the point of stopping, before it flared up again.

====================================
Richard Conn, Principal Investigator
Reuse Tapestry


-----Original Message-----
From: Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Craig Spannring
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2000 8:14 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Can we stop this %$#@ thread? was Re: Standards


This thread not only left Ada a long time ago, the undercurrent left
the subject line a long time ago as well.  The point being argued
isn't standards, it's whether Microsoft is a saint or a devil.

We have one side arguing the Microsoft is the greatest thing that ever
hit the software industry, the other arguing that the first side
doesn't know what they're talking about.

I think at least one of the sides needs to remeber the old saying,
"Never argue with a fool, a passer-by might not be able to tell the
difference."


--
=======================================================================
 Life is short.                  | Craig Spannring
      Bike hard, ski fast.       | [log in to unmask]
 --------------------------------+------------------------------------
  When all you've got is Perl, everything feels like a smashed thumb
=======================================================================

ATOM RSS1 RSS2