ACMWE_SC Archives

acmwe_sc

ACMWE_SC@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reyyan Ayfer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Reyyan Ayfer <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 9 Sep 2019 18:51:26 +0300
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (4 kB) multipart/related (4 kB) , text/html (25 kB) , image001.jpg (52 kB)
Hi Bev,

Reducing the number of questions is a very good attempt.

I would suggest to separate <the best> and <needs improvement> to 
different questions.

Thanks and best regards.

Reyyan

On 9.09.2019 10:44, Bev Bachmayer wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I have made some major changes for 2019,  see the changes here. 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1x0v-r5PMMLpYzuWaOwGzAKhJfV184pxMhI3woADTCro/edit
>
> Note,  I am working to significantly reduce the number of question for 
> the entire event.  My goal is 10 questions total which will give us 
> some insight as to the effectiveness of the event.
>
> Knowing that our goal is to provide women with role models, networking 
> opportunities  and revive their commitment to the career (please let 
> me know if this is wrong).  I am trying to focus the questions on 
> whether we meet those goals.
>
> We can send session surveys for all the workshops,  hackathon.  A 
> separate survey for the career fair to both attendees and the 
> supporters.   I am also sure that we can add session surveys of three 
> questions for each of the keynotes and the panels.  These I would have 
> a request at the end of each session to fill out online.  These will 
> have three questions:
>
> Please provide me with ideas and comments,  and suggestions.
>
> Bev
>
> *From:*Nuria Castell - UPC <[log in to unmask]>
> *Sent:* Sunday, September 8, 2019 8:24 PM
> *To:* Bev Bachmayer <[log in to unmask]>; [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* Re: Evaluation questions
>
> Dear Bev,
>
> The surveys are very exhaustive to cover everything. Good to obtain 
> lot of information, but hard to answer.
>
> Maybe we can simplify a bit the attendees form (15 pages). There is a 
> lot of questions about comments. I know that they are optional, but 
> they contribute to give the impression that the survey is very long. 
> For instance, instead of having comments for every aspect of 
> pre-event, we can have just one comment question at the end of 
> pre-event section.
>
> Any item of the program has a question on evaluation and a question 
> about comments. Maybe questions can be asked in a more global way just 
> to reduce the number of questions and the length of the survey.
>
> Regarding the mandatory questions, I'm not sure how the system will 
> control (if the system does it) that  a question if mandatory only if 
> you have answered yes in a previous question (this it the case for the 
> workshops, for instance).
>
> Also, in some mandatory questions we should add the option "not 
> attended". Maybe a participant doesn't assist to a keynote speech for 
> any reason and he/she is forced to answer about the quality of the 
> speech.
>
> Anyway we should take in mind that answering the attendees survey will 
> take some time, more than 5 minutes. We need to give enough time to 
> the participants before preparing the prize draw list.
>
> Thanks for preparing all the forms !
>
> Kind regards
>
> Núria
>
> El 06/09/2019 a las 21:23, Bev Bachmayer escribió:
>
>     HI
>
>     I uploaded the current questions for all three surveys to the
>     drive here
>
>     _https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1JOwOer1pRCGGaLHgj-p1KaWNiHyA9jt8_
>
>     _Additionally, I added the few questions from my cvent survey
>     below.  I think these are critical to measure the value of the event._
>
>     _Bev_
>
>     ·*stions*
>     <https://app.cvent.com/Subscribers/Events2/EventFeedback/SurveyQuestions/Index/?evtstub=267c9fb3-dc28-4645-a592-3afa1ea9a4ee&surveyId=560935>
>
>     ·Survey Settings
>     <https://app.cvent.com/Subscribers/Events2/EventFeedback/SurveySettings/Index/?evtstub=267c9fb3-dc28-4645-a592-3afa1ea9a4ee&surveyId=560935>
>
>
>                 How likely are you to recommend womENcourage to a
>                 friend or colleague?
>
>     ·Yes I would recommend
>
>     ·No I would not recommend
>
>
>                 Are you willing to attend womENcourage in the future?
>
>     ·Yes, excited to attend
>
>     ·Yes, I would like to
>
>     ·No
>
>     ·I am not sure
>
>     Bev Bachmayer
>
>     Supporter Chair womENcourage 2014-2019
>
>     Chair womENcourage Steering Committee
>
> -- 
> ********************************************************
> Ms. Dr. Nuria Castell Ariño
> Natural Language Processing Group
> IDEAI Research Center
> Departament CS
> UPC - Campus Nord
> Edifici Omega - despatx 315
> Jordi Girona Salgado, 1-3
> 08034 Barcelona
> Spain
> telf: +34 - 93 413 78 56
> [log in to unmask]  <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> http://www.talp.upc.edu/
> https://ideai.upc.edu/en
> ********************************************************


ATOM RSS1 RSS2