ACMWE_SC Archives

acmwe_sc

ACMWE_SC@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bev Bachmayer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Bev Bachmayer <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 14 Sep 2019 20:38:06 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (262 lines)
The result is the each workshop gets ratings from the participants
which is invaluable to the presenters.
They would be very disappointed if they get no real ratings and input.

I would like comments for each workshop also,  as this is the best
information for them.

Bev

On Sat, 14 Sep 2019 at 20:19, Patrascu Cristina Alexandra
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Ok will change that. I have the same questions but they were just grouped in a grid. 'did you attend any workshops' is not a question we expect an answer. The answers are individually pe each workshop speaker/ moderator and each workshop content.
>
> I will make them separately if you thing that visually will be better.
>
> Let me know about the other sections too.
>
> Best,
>
> Alexandra
>
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2019, 19:14 Bev Bachmayer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> ditto on the workshop comments for day 3,  we need individual input
>> for each workshop.
>>
>> You can put the sentence before each one.
>>
>> Did you attend workshop xxxx,  if so answer the following questions.
>>
>> We cannot have them all in one questions,  just does not give us
>> enough information.
>>
>> Bev
>>
>> On Sat, 14 Sep 2019 at 13:32, Patrascu Cristina Alexandra
>> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Bev,
>> >
>> > Here are the links to all the feedback forms:
>> > https://forms.gle/Pv2wWuqp3kqDCWXh7 - Day one
>> > https://forms.gle/63SMPdZ9josYBs1ZA - Day two
>> > https://forms.gle/Y9m7PkyPd95Dgc8R7 - Day three
>> >
>> > The forms are added to the Evaluations folder that you shared with me.
>> >
>> > I also prepared the attached file so we can print it and display around the venue. Check the PDF or the correct layout.
>> >
>> > -----------------------------------------
>> > Alexandra Cristina Dediu
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 4:53 PM Bev Bachmayer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Thanks so very much Alexandra,
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Bev
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> From: Patrascu Cristina Alexandra <[log in to unmask]>
>> >> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2019 5:47 PM
>> >> To: Bev Bachmayer <[log in to unmask]>
>> >> Cc: Núria Castell <[log in to unmask]>; [log in to unmask]
>> >> Subject: Re: Update to the evaluations
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Yes, of course only what they attend with NA. I will create them today and send you for review.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Best,
>> >>
>> >> -----------------------------------------
>> >>
>> >> Alexandra Cristina Dediu
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 4:31 PM Bev Bachmayer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I think we should put that they should only fill out what they attended.  And put a NA option on each one.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Bev
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> From: Patrascu Cristina Alexandra <[log in to unmask]>
>> >> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2019 11:00 AM
>> >> To: Bev Bachmayer <[log in to unmask]>
>> >> Cc: Núria Castell <[log in to unmask]>; [log in to unmask]
>> >> Subject: Re: Update to the evaluations
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Hi!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Regarding the raffles, I can identify only the people that completed all the surveys and only consider those. (of course they should put their name in as well)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> This way we can try to make people complete all the 3 days and not just one day. I believe we still have a bit too much, because we ask for questions about every session and people might not have attended. But it's ok I guess, the questions will be optional. We will go with whatever approach you think is best.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >>
>> >> -----------------------------------------
>> >>
>> >> Alexandra Cristina Dediu
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 8:56 AM Bev Bachmayer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> My thought is that each survey can be filled once,  and one raffle number for each filled survey,  so the possibility is that each person receives raffle chances.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I removed the organization, logistics and such because those questions will come with the larger survey from ACM that is sent out each year. If you think we need it in addition then we can add one question.
>> >>
>> >> Alexandra,  can you please add a question before number 11, which asks about organization, logistics, etc?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Bev
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> From: Núria Castell <[log in to unmask]>
>> >> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2019 9:45 AM
>> >> To: Bev Bachmayer <[log in to unmask]>; [log in to unmask]
>> >> Subject: Re: Update to the evaluations
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Dear Bev,
>> >>
>> >> There is no question on general organization, logistics, information for participants,...
>> >>
>> >> Maybe just one general question grading (1-10) the conference for those aspects could be enough.
>> >>
>> >> A question just before
>> >> 11.    What we can improve for our future womENcourage Celebrations?
>> >> and
>> >> 12.    What was your favorite part of the entire Celebration?
>> >>
>> >> Regarding the procedure, what is the idea:
>> >>
>> >> a) each participant send his/her answers to the survey every day
>> >>
>> >> b) the survey form is incremental and can be filled day by day, stored, and made the final sending the last day
>> >>
>> >> Option b needs a system based on account creation and storage management
>> >>
>> >> Option a is simple, but in this case: Will each participant have as many "numbers" for the raffle as submitted forms? or sending the survey for just one day,  is it enough for raffle participation?
>> >>
>> >> Kind regards
>> >>
>> >> Núria
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> El 13/09/2019 a las 7:54, Bev Bachmayer escribió:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Hi everyone,
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Here is the update to the eval forms.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Essentially I wanted to have just one survey for each day.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> So if you look at it I just rearranged the survey by the day.  We can send an email every day asking for the feedback and it will be shorter each day.
>> >>
>> >> Except the last day.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Additionally I changed the career fair survey to be a participant survey,  I will send the supporters a separate survey with questions directed at them.
>> >>
>> >> And each talk, panel and workshop have 3 questions.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> What do you think.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Bev Bachmayer
>> >>
>> >> Supporter Chair womENcourage 2014-2019
>> >>
>> >> Chair womENcourage Steering Committee
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ********************************************************
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Ms. Dr. Nuria Castell Ariño
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Natural Language Processing Group
>> >>
>> >> IDEAI Research Center
>> >>
>> >> Departament CS
>> >>
>> >> UPC - Campus Nord
>> >>
>> >> Edifici Omega - despatx 315
>> >>
>> >> Jordi Girona Salgado, 1-3
>> >>
>> >> 08034 Barcelona
>> >>
>> >> Spain
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> telf: +34 - 93 413 78 56
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> [log in to unmask]
>> >>
>> >> http://www.talp.upc.edu/
>> >>
>> >> https://ideai.upc.edu/en
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ********************************************************
>> >>
>> >>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2