On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:55:37 +0200, Elizabeth J. Pyatt <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> [Nielsen's] eyetracking & usability studies generally find that online
> readers scan rather than read (partly because monitor legibility isn't
> as good as print legibility)
I remember a talk at CHI a few years ago [maybe Vienna] that showed that
if links weren't underlined that people started reading again rather than
scanning. Unfortunately I can't now find the reference.
If anyone can point to it, I'd be much obliged.
Steven Pemberton
--------------------------------------------------------------
Tip of the Day: Postings must be in plain text
CHI-WEB: www.sigchi.org/web POSTINGS: mailto:[log in to unmask]
MODERATORS: mailto:[log in to unmask]
SUBSCRIPTION CHANGES & FAQ: www.sigchi.org/web/faq.html
--------------------------------------------------------------