Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:02:00 +0000 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 10 Feb 2006, at 01:35, Oliver Moran wrote:
> I would always have associated a check box with a positive
> statement, since a check is equivalent to a "tick" or a "correct"
> i.e. a positive statement, the opposite to an 'X'.
Bear in mind this isn't universal though, e.g. in some countries
(Scandanavian? I forget off-hand), a tick/checkmark is used to mark
a /wrong/ answer.
Cheeri,
Calum.
--
CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland
mailto:[log in to unmask] Java Desktop System Team
http://blogs.sun.com/calum +353 1 819 9771
Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems
--------------------------------------------------------------
Tip of the Day: Postings must be in plain text
CHI-WEB: www.sigchi.org/web POSTINGS: mailto:[log in to unmask]
MODERATORS: mailto:[log in to unmask]
SUBSCRIPTION CHANGES & FAQ: www.sigchi.org/web/faq.html
--------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|