CHI-WEB Archives

ACM SIGCHI WWW Human Factors (Open Discussion)

CHI-WEB@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Katie Albers <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Katie Albers <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 22 May 2006 12:15:18 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (56 lines)
I suspect that in both cases, the goal is to find out "What 
bird/tree/plant is that" and the end point is the name. If you 
already know the name, you do not refer to the identification tool. I 
also suspect that I am not the only person in the world who is prone 
to ask myself "Where am I?" and consider that the name of the 
location is usually a satisfactory answer. Things which do not have 
names make me (rationally or not) feel "un-placed." And that's why 
Mapquest's directions in Boston don't say "Get off 3 and go towards 
the big buildings."

You aren't going to design a perfect interface that is perfectly 
usable by everyone. Sooner or later, someone will ask another user a 
question about something. It's much easier to place the understanding 
and the misunderstanding if the questioner can say "What am I 
supposed to do on 'Edit' page?" rather than "What am I supposed to do 
on this page that has the 5 fields in the column on the left with the 
big field on the right?" In addition to minimizing the possibility of 
misunderstanding and error, you also need to minimize the difficulty 
of recovering from misunderstanding and error. And that's one of 
reasons names are needed.

Names provide a sense of familiarity and context. We "know" things by 
reference to their name. That's why things are named at all, ever. 
Well, that and the magic.

Katie

>So they can refer to it later. They do the same thing with birds. 
>But a picture works much better for identifying a flower or bird 
>than a name does. In fact, birding enthusiasts use something they 
>call GISS (general information shape and size) to identify birds. 
>The name is secondary.
>
>On May 22, 2006, at 10:46 AM, Hal Shubin wrote:
>
>>The problem about naming pages came up because I was unable to 
>>clearly refer to the four editing pages in this application while I 
>>was writing the usability report. Names are funny. When I show 
>>people plants in my garden, they always ask the name of the plant, 
>>even if they don't know about plants. Why? I dunno, but people 
>>really like naming things.
>
>
>Cheers!
>
>Todd R. Warfel
>Partner, Design & Usability Specialist
>Messagefirst | designing and usability consulting

    --------------------------------------------------------------
    Tip of the Day: Use the archives to research common questions
     CHI-WEB: www.sigchi.org/web POSTINGS: mailto:[log in to unmask]
              MODERATORS: mailto:[log in to unmask]
       SUBSCRIPTION CHANGES & FAQ:  www.sigchi.org/web/faq.html
    --------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2