CHI-WEB Archives

ACM SIGCHI WWW Human Factors (Open Discussion)

CHI-WEB@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Skot Nelson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Skot Nelson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 26 Sep 2011 12:43:28 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
I didn't get the impression they thought I was taking nonsense, but I appreciate the vigorous defence.

I do think there was a time when PDF was synonymous with Acrobat...I think that time has long passed.

I don't think that's happened yet with Word files. Perhaps if Openoffice is adopted more widely one day we'll refer to them as word processing documents, but for now there's a pretty close correlation.

I haven't researched that, mind you. A gut feeling.
--
Skot Nelson
[log in to unmask]
http://www.penguinstorm.com/

twitter. penguinstorm

On 2011-09-26, at 9:59, Matthew Dull <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> reader to view PDFs".  So many users can
> easily link the words PDF, Adobe, and Acrobat together.  It's similar

    --------------------------------------------------------------
        Tip of the Day: Forward out-of-office replies to
                    mailto:[log in to unmask]
            CHI-WEB: www.sigchi.org/resources/web/faq.html
              MODERATOR: mailto:[log in to unmask]
    --------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2