CHI-WEB Archives

ACM SIGCHI WWW Human Factors (Open Discussion)

CHI-WEB@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"ACM SIGCHI WWW Human Factors (Open Discussion)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Marc Crawford <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 28 Oct 1999 20:31:05 +0000
Reply-To:
Tom Hume <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Tom Hume <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (18 lines)
On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, Marc Crawford wrote:

> An alternative to "reset" is "clear" (sometimes "clear fields"). Does anyone
> know which of these is better? I know that "submit" has been criticized as
> being too geekish - and I never liked it much myself.

"Clear" isn't entirely accurate - clicking a reset button sets the fields
to their initial values, as opposed to just deleting everything from the
fields.

"Submit" is IMHO pretty horrible. I favour having the label for the submit
button relate to the action being carried out. On a registration form,
"Register"; on a page inviting a sale, "Buy", and so on.

---
[log in to unmask]           "hardly says a word, always carries a bench"
Good Technology ltd.                     http://www.goodtech.co.uk/~tom/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2