TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 08:48:35 -0700
Reply-To: "Robert C. Leif, Ph.D." <[log in to unmask]>
From: "Robert C. Leif, Ph.D." <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (29 lines)
To: Brice Lecomte et al.

From: Bob Leif, Ph.D.

So far, my informal search has revealed none, except for one possible,
unconfirmed Ada '83 Verdix library, which quite possibly may not have been
written in Ada.

In short, we have a golden opportunity to hype Ada! The real question is how
do we motivate some organization(s) to do the PR? Unfortunately, the
marketing capability of the Ada community with few exceptions is inversely
proportional to its technical ability. I might note that if Ada '95 were
hatched today, it would make a fantastic Internet technology stock offering.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Brice Lecomte
> Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 1999 5:42 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Ada and Y2K
> hello there,
> sorry but I can't find any FAQ about ada and Y2K.
> What about ?
> --
> Brice