TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Chad Bremmon <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 25 Jul 1997 10:56:45 -0700
Reply-To:
Eric James DeArment <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Eric James DeArment <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (17 lines)
I agree.  Ada was very easy for me to learn, while C was almost
impossible.  IMO, Ada programs always look neat and tidy, while C/C++
programs look like a bunch of gibberish.

                                                        -Eric-

+----------------------------------------------+
| "It is what sustained us through our         |
|  days, the truth that was in our hearts      |
|  and strength in our arms, and fulfillment   |
|  in our tounges."-Oisin Mac Finn             |
|                                              |
|  Eric DeArment                               |
|  [log in to unmask]                                 |
|  Team Ada member                             |
+----------------------------------------------+

ATOM RSS1 RSS2