TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To: Chad Bremmon <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 10:56:45 -0700
Reply-To: Eric James DeArment <[log in to unmask]>
From: Eric James DeArment <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
MIME-Version: 1.0
Parts/Attachments: TEXT/PLAIN (17 lines)
I agree.  Ada was very easy for me to learn, while C was almost
impossible.  IMO, Ada programs always look neat and tidy, while C/C++
programs look like a bunch of gibberish.

                                                        -Eric-

+----------------------------------------------+
| "It is what sustained us through our         |
|  days, the truth that was in our hearts      |
|  and strength in our arms, and fulfillment   |
|  in our tounges."-Oisin Mac Finn             |
|                                              |
|  Eric DeArment                               |
|  [log in to unmask]                                 |
|  Team Ada member                             |
+----------------------------------------------+

ATOM RSS1 RSS2