TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Simon Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 5 May 2000 20:25:13 +0100
In-Reply-To:
X-To:
Reply-To:
Simon Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
> In other words, if it's important to you that a compiler support dates
> past 2038, your only assurance is the vendor's promise that their internal
> representation is immmune to any such "flaws" in the O.S.  (Or in some
> cases, personal inspection of the compiler source and/or the generated
> code.)

But unless you're running on a bare machine, you'll be totally
dependent on the OS (I presume the need is to _use_ the software after
2038, not just to have it handle dates after that when executed
before).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2