TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Rose, Charles S." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Rose, Charles S.
Date:
Tue, 27 Jun 2000 17:44:53 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (48 lines)
A few years ago, I wrote some software that used
complex numbers.

A separate processor generated complex data samples,
and my code performed some processing including a
complex square root.

The software was in Ada 83.  I used the GNAT
Complex_Elementary_Functions source code, modified
as necessary for Ada 83.

Charles
BAE Systems, Phone: (631) 262-8204



-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Feldman [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2000 4:18 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Actual Ada projects that use complex numbers


Hi all,

A colleague of mine here at GW, who teaches both Ada and C++ here
and is reasonably language-neutral, has asked me to probe my
friends in net-land and find out "whether there are Ada projects
out there that have really relied on complex numbers".

Intuitively both of us think there are. He is a mathematician
at heart, and a big believer that a language without complex
support is doomed to fail in the scientific community. He wants,
I think, to be able to "sell" complex numbers to students based
on their genuine applicability and application.

So please help me out if you can. Please don;t speculate - if
you _know_ of a project that has used either an Ada 83 add-on,
or the Ada 95 complex stuff, plase let me know privately. Tell me
as much or as little as you feel comfortable with.

Let's not start a thread here; I will summarize the responses after I
get some.:-)

Thanks!

Mike Feldman

ATOM RSS1 RSS2