TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
From: "W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 16:45:49 -0500
Reply-To: "W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (14 lines)
> [1]Politically, this makes a lot of sense. [2]There is no way CNA can state
> anything
> other given that the Ada mandate is gone. [3]Seems like they are trying to be
> friendly to whatever choice a program manager decides to make.

[1]Program language choice should not be a political decision.

[2]The DoD ended the mandate that the deck be stacked in favor of Ada in
language decisions. The DoD did not mandate that we pretend all languages
are created equal.

[3]Are you saying that the CNA's job is to play yes-man to the program
manager?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2