TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Tucker Taft <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 19 Mar 1998 19:43:52 -0500
X-To:
Reply-To:
Tucker Taft <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
> >While we're in the same general area, why wasn't the exit statement
> >permitted to exit a block statement?
>
> Having spent a lot of effort to get this to work, I can assure that there
> is no such limitation in Ada 83 or in Ada 95.

I think you may have misinterpreted the question.

I suspect the question was why can't you use "exit foo;" to go to
the statement immediately following the end of the enclosing block
named foo, since blocks can have labels just like loops?

I.e., why is "exit" only defined for loops?

> ...
>                                 Randy.
>

-Tuck

ATOM RSS1 RSS2