TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
From: Simon Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 20:59:33 GMT
In-Reply-To: <000201c2d372$29f1a530$116fa8c0@thinkpadbruce> (message from Bruce Hennessy on Thu, 13 Feb 2003 10:11:19 -0500)
Reply-To: Simon Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (11 lines)
> From: Bruce Hennessy <[log in to unmask]>

> Forget about having a pissing contest on which diagram technique to
> use; the thing with UML is that it is a global standard, hence a
> language that all developers can use to communicate design
> ideas.

Seems to me that the problem with UML is that it's presented so
informally that people think they can just charge in and start using
it. This doesn't lead to good communication!

ATOM RSS1 RSS2