TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To: Wojtek Narczynski <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:25:44 +0100
Reply-To: Samuel Tardieu <[log in to unmask]>
From: Samuel Tardieu <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Organization: RFC 1149 (see http://www.rfc1149.net/)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (17 lines)
On 13/02, Wojtek Narczynski wrote:

| james hopper wrote:
| 
| >AdaSockets (http://www.rfc1149.net/devel/adasockets), and gnat has
| >gnat.sockets (g-socket.ad[sb]).  I have used both to communicate over
| >net between computers.  i found that the gnat version of sockets is
| >really slow compared to the adasockets stuff.
| 
| Maybe this is about buffering, mean gnat sockets are unbuffered and you
| need to do your own buffering if you read data in many pieces? Just a
| theroy...

Probably, AdaSockets comes with a selectable builtin buffer facility.

  Sam

ATOM RSS1 RSS2