TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
X-cc:
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Philip Brashear <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 11 Feb 1997 19:16:55 -0500
In-Reply-To:
Your message of "Tue, 11 Feb 1997 17:48:42 CST." <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Reply-To:
Philip Brashear <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 lines)
Phil (Johnson) reminds me that the ACES code size measurement applies only
to the actual code segment under test, and that the total executable size
may be more in line with what you want.  As is always the case with
performance assessment, it depends on what you're looking for.  When your
only tool is a hammer (in my case, the ACES), everything looks like a nail.

Phil (Brashear)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2