TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To: "David J.A. Koogler" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 12:22:23 +1000
Reply-To: Dale Stanbrough <[log in to unmask]>
From: Dale Stanbrough <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (25 lines)
At 10:30 AM -0400 15/6/00, David J.A. Koogler wrote:

>C/C++ programmers either have to
>implement their own fixed-point mechanism, or use floating-point. Most
>choose floating-point and their calculations suffer round-off errors.
>It is always funny watching a C/C++ team defend their implementation
>when the auditors discover the discrepencies. Its takes lots of special
>code to avoid the round-off errors, something most C/C++ programmers
>seldom implement.


Here's my prediction...


        the round off requirements will be changed to meet the
        C/C++/Java implementations.


Given the proliferation of business/internet software that don't even
realise that there is a problem,legislators will be faced with a fait-accompli,
and will accept the status quo.


Dale

ATOM RSS1 RSS2