TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
"David J.A. Koogler" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 16 Jun 2000 12:22:23 +1000
Reply-To:
Dale Stanbrough <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Dale Stanbrough <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
At 10:30 AM -0400 15/6/00, David J.A. Koogler wrote:

>C/C++ programmers either have to
>implement their own fixed-point mechanism, or use floating-point. Most
>choose floating-point and their calculations suffer round-off errors.
>It is always funny watching a C/C++ team defend their implementation
>when the auditors discover the discrepencies. Its takes lots of special
>code to avoid the round-off errors, something most C/C++ programmers
>seldom implement.


Here's my prediction...


        the round off requirements will be changed to meet the
        C/C++/Java implementations.


Given the proliferation of business/internet software that don't even
realise that there is a problem,legislators will be faced with a fait-accompli,
and will accept the status quo.


Dale

ATOM RSS1 RSS2