TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
From: Simon Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 05:27:36 +0000
Reply-To: Simon Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (12 lines)
> From: "Kester, Rush W." <[log in to unmask]>

> In my experience, the "cycles" for circular dependencies are never
> very large.

We had a cycle with 750 units (or so; anyway, rather more units than
in the compilation!)

One thing to watch out for is library-level tasks (task Foo is ..)
which call operations in other units. They need to become task types.
GNAT 3.14 has a long discussion on elaboration issues in the UM.